Skip to content


#PhDTruths My response to @TaraBrabazon’s @TimesHigherEd piece

A few days ago, I posted a few tweets on my stream with the hashtag #PhDTruths before I read the Times Higher Education piece by Dr. Tara Brabazon (which came out right about then). I normally love Professor Brabazon’s pieces (I’ve promoted them before on my Twitter feed), but this piece rubbed me the wrong way. Surely, there are a few gems (particularly around the politics of completing a doctorate), and Professor Brabazon gets into the heart of why one shouldn’t always seek to be supervised by SuperProfessor. That said, I think that it is more important to remind PhD students that both supervisors and themselves are humans and to take a more human approach to supervising/achieving a PhD. These are my tweets in Storify form.

You can share this blog post on the following social networks by clicking on their icon.

Posted in academia.

Tagged with , .


3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Chris Parr says

    Hi – just to let you know the article was in Times Higher Education, not on Inside Higher Ed. Cheers!

  2. Raul Pacheco-Vega, PhD says

    It’s stated correctly on the blog post’s title and in the text of the blog post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Speculative Diction | War of Attrition – Asking Why PhD Students Leave | University Affairs linked to this post on July 17, 2013

    […] many causes for problems with completion. Any relationship is a two-way street, as pointed out in this post by Raul Pacheco-Vega. There are plenty of faculty who are already engaging in the helpful practices […]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



shares